![]() ![]() If you are also looking at other options, users on our site most often compare these solutions to ParaSoft SOA. This habit complicates working with Git, since Git thinks that the user has made hundreds of changes. SoapUI 1.8.0 has this annoying habit of touching/changing many files that are unrelated to a test developer's actual change. We are planning to get SoapUI tests written earlier (thus moving some test development upstream). #APACHE JMETER VS SOAPUI MANUAL#This solution also enabled manual testers to write automated tests, which they would not have been able to do in Java. #APACHE JMETER VS SOAPUI CODE#Using this solution, we developed tests about three times faster than we did with Java and by doing manual REST reverse engineering from product code (Java). The XML format makes it easy for scripts to analyze the test base (metrics, bulk simple changes). ![]() Additionally, the Simple programming model enables a wide audience (in contrast to Java or JavaScript). I found the REST Discovery and Groovy scripting features to be most valuable. SoapUI user review from our community: Valuable Features: Suppose you put everything in loop controller and error doesn't log you out then the script start to login when you are already logged in and tends to fail. Now if an error comes when the user simply logouts due to some unhandled error then the script expects that your session would continue but if that error has made you logout then your next iterations won't go through and vice versa. Re-iteration problems during errors - Usually we have login in once only controller, Action in Loop controller and logout in once only controller.Cannot do a mass replace( Ctrl+H) on the GUI ( can do it if script is opened via notepad++).Ctrl+z( Undo doesn't work) so gets very inconvenient at times.GUI tends to freeze and shutdown under more load.Very lightweight and low usage of resources.Easy LG(Master & Slaves) configuration setup.Robust scripts which could handle build changes.Availability Non-GUI mode which consumes even lesser resources than already lightweight GUI version.Host of plugins which further boost its effectiveness. #APACHE JMETER VS SOAPUI DOWNLOAD#Very easy to download and setup the entire infrastructure (Controller +LGs).Jmeter review from our community: Valuable Features: We have detailed user reviews for both SoapUI and Jmeter on IT Central Station. Try the tools yourself and if you can achieve what you want, then you have found the right toolset. ![]() If you prefer to use a range of tools for different testing aspects, then I think that's fine too. To sum up, try the different tools and don't restrict yourself. Plus, there are lots of other tools available for such tests. I think that is a perfectly valid approach. Other people on here have mentioned simply coding your web service tests. Not saying JMeter doesn't offer this, I simply haven't had the need to try. Test execution can be done from the command line if you wish. Once you have built your tests, you certainly don't need to use the UI to just run them. I believe SoapUi can be integrated into Maven and CI. ![]() Plus, I invested a reasonable amount of time in building my tests in SoapUi so not keen on ditching all that just to use one tool. I could probably do a lot more in JMeter, but I personally don't find the UI as nice as SoapUI's. So, I simply used JMeter for load testing. Why two tools? Well, when I started testing services, I firstly used SoapUi, but when it came to load testing, I found the functionality lacking. I use JMeter for load testing the web services. Or may return a 200, with a meaningful error message. calling a services with an invalid payload returns a 500. These include postive and negative response checks. I like the 'out of the box' assertions for checking responses are as expected. I really like SoapUi's GUI and it's ability to create data-driven (parameterised) tests. What follows is merely my own opinion, so please don't shoot me down. I use SoapUi for functional testing of web services and I use JMeter for load. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |